Russia is a country where tragedy
and angst are guests that never leave.
That is not to say that Russia
or Russians hold no amount of humor and light, I'm sure. I've never been
there, but I collect Soviet "anecdotii" (jokes), wickedly sarcastic
and funny views of the burdens Russians and others endured throughout that era.
Now, it is not a Communist economy
the people have to fear, but
another Russian tragedy, and it is the
direct result of State[i] intervention....albeit
intervention that is no doubt backed by a sincere wish to "help
people."
A designer drug called
"Krokodil", a sort of home-made desomorphine is
making the rounds in the slums of Siberia and Ukraine. As far as I can
see, "Krokodil" is suicide in a syringe. It is made from
codeine--available over the counter in Russia--iodine; and something called red
phosphorous, right in the user(s)' home in a pot on the stove. The high
from Krokodil lasts about an hour and a half, and supposedly painful
withdrawal symptoms set in right away so the ability to avoid injecting more is
probably nil.
(Before I go on, a couple of
caveats. A homemade drug, used in a country whose HIV population stems
largely from used needles, has dangers that aren't necessarily associated with
the commercial or medical variety. The
pharmacological variety was used safely for medical purposes in the early 20th
century.
Also, as I write it occurs to me that this sounds a little like Reefer Madness and other anti-drug propaganda. So the information available to us about its manufacture and consequences may be exaggerated. Nevertheless, in the interest of erring on the side of caution, I feel an urgency to inform others.)
The cycle that seems to occur
in most cases--cooking, injection, high, cooking, injection, high--causes permanent
physical effects shortly after it begins, from skin lesions up to and including
the loss of skin and muscle such that bones are bared. Brain damage, and
eventually death, occur if the cycle isn't broken quickly (users are said
to have a longevity of only 1-3 years after use begins).
Those who do want to break the
cycle are subject to unbelievably painful withdrawal symptoms which last 2-4
times as long as that from heroin withdrawal; and of course treatment of
wounds and rotting limbs is painful in itself. I would also guess that
use of such a potent drug would render many pain killers ineffective.
Why would people want to
do something that is almost guaranteed to kill them, and definitely guaranteed
to cause horrible disfigurement? They assuredly don't; maybe many of them
aren't educated about the effects before starting. Certainly others,
particularly young people who have thus far avoided any sense of not being
invincible, see its use as an adventure.
But many are people who
used to use heroin, and who, because of their addiction and its scarcity, are
willing to take the chance.
Russia is a nation with one of
the highest rates of heroin abuse and dependence. They would like to get
rid of that title. Politicians and concerned professionals got together
and decided on what they thought was a way to dramatically reduce the incidence
of heroin use: tighten the border with Afghanistan to reduce the
trafficking of opium. (See the second paragraph in this article)
Unfortunately, this crackdown
has resulted in what always occurs when a vice is prohibited or
made more difficult to obtain. People will find a way to replicate
the effects of their drug or drink or habit. Most of the time, if a
homemade substance is used to stem the desire of a another drug, immediate
personal injury isn't a risk. Bathtub gin drinkers in the 1920s and
window box pot gardeners of the 1970s were probably physically fine after
indulging in their favorite drug, unless they drove into an accident or were
beaten up during an arrest. Krokodil has broken that barrier.
Ben Stone of badquaker.com has advised that when the State
heightens restrictions or outright bans a substance, whatever replaces it will
be 10 times as potent and 10 times as dangerous. That is certainly the
case with Krokodil, which is said to be exactly 10 times as potent as heroin
and many more times as destructive to the human body. It is also 10 times
cheaper: the usual dose of heroin costs about 62 Euros (probably around
100 dollars); the usual dose of Krokodil goes for 6.20 Euros. This
directly reverses the effect the State probably wanted in the first place:
reduced use. Furthermore, the difference in price with heroin is
directly due to heroin's current degree of scarcity.
Instead of restricting the
availability of a product, it would be nice if education about the drug and
treatment were more available. I don't know what the availability of
treatment in Russia is; I would predict that traditional stigmatism and denial
regarding drug and alcohol use (the Soviet Union insisted it had no significant
rate of alcoholism throughout its existence, even as its citizens stepped
over countless drunks in the streets and subways, for instance) serve to make
treatment poor and scarce. All tied up in that, of course, is the
tendency for people all around the world to see substance abuse as a personal
defect or weakness. Who would want to tell their doctor they used this
stuff?
Krokodil and the spread of its
use are a direct result of the State's jackbooted assault on freedom and
personal choice, however well-intended. There are awful personal
consequences of the use of heroin OR desomorphine; but the world should know by
now that restriction and prohibition worsens those consequences instead of
ameliorating them.
A Youtube video with more information is here, but do not watch if you don't have a strong stomach. NSFW, although since my office provides substance abuse treatment, I went ahead and looked anyway. Gruesome.
ADDENDUM:
About a month ago, scary headlines alerted the US public to "cases" of krokodil use in Arizona and Oklahoma. The Oklahoma deaths were found not to have been caused by the drug; other cases are questionable, and the DEA has not yet officially announced the existence of krokodil here. According to Newsweek, the fact that codeine is not available over the counter may be slowing would by krokodil users down, making other synthetics preferable.--kln, 11/16/2013
A Youtube video with more information is here, but do not watch if you don't have a strong stomach. NSFW, although since my office provides substance abuse treatment, I went ahead and looked anyway. Gruesome.
ADDENDUM:
About a month ago, scary headlines alerted the US public to "cases" of krokodil use in Arizona and Oklahoma. The Oklahoma deaths were found not to have been caused by the drug; other cases are questionable, and the DEA has not yet officially announced the existence of krokodil here. According to Newsweek, the fact that codeine is not available over the counter may be slowing would by krokodil users down, making other synthetics preferable.--kln, 11/16/2013
[i] By
State, I do not mean any one government or one of the different United States
of America, Mexico or Brazil. I mean the
imaginary construct by which people have been encouraged to see their own
government or any group of individuals as “authority” or “saviors”. The State can
be a national government, a mob, or any combination of people who aim to control other groups of people. My underlying assumption
is that a human being’s natural state (no pun intended!) is free from the constraints of undesired government.
No comments :
Post a Comment